all the information is provided, pls don't ask for additional/missing info because there are not any. pls try to help thanks

Choose a company that your group is familiar with or your group can interview the relevant HR persons. Analyze and comment the human resources functions and performance of the investigated company, including the following: Human resource planning Recruitment approach Staff orientation Training and development Performance management and appraisal Compensation and motivation (Career Development) As group of consultants, you are required to comment the human resources performance and make recommendations to improve the effectiveness. Group Size: No more than 6 members . I student: 1,200 words (or above) Assessment Rubric (Group Project) Member List: Assessment Criteria: Distinction (10.9) Credit (8,7) Average (6,5) Failure (2.1) Marginal Pass (4.3) Content Introduction setting out the Paper (10%) Very comprehensive, and logical description Comprehensive and logical description Fairly comprehensive, and logical description A bit illogical description and insufficient coverage Discussion of the company and department background (10%) Very comprehensive, and critical discussion Comprehensive and critical discussion Fairly comprehensive and critical discussion A bit illogical discussion and insufficient coverage Illogical description and missing significant elements Illogical discussion and missing significant elements Illogical with very superficial or biased analysis Discussion and assessment of the Very comprehensive human resources practices and and logical discussion performance (40%) with in-depth and critical analysis Conclusion and recommendations Very conclusive, to the company to Improve the comprehensive, and human resources performance feasible (20%) Comprehensive and logical discussion with reasonably in-depth analysis Conclusive, comprehensive, and feasible Fairly comprehensive and logical discussion with analysis not in-depth enough Fairly conclusive, comprehensive and feasible Perspectives too narrow with a bit illogical: analysis tends to be superficial and with bias Perspectives too narrow with a bit illogical: analysis tends to be superficial and with bias Illogical with very superficial or biased analysis Organization and Presentation Appropriate report format and referencing (20%) Few and minor deficiencies in English Harvard referencing is complete and accurate throughout Excellent standard of written English Excellent presentation that professionally reflects business standards. Literatures cited are latest and comprehensive Harvard referencing is complete and accurate High standard of written English. Literatures cited are quite recent and comprehensive Literatures cited are quite recent and comprehensive Harvard referencing is complete and accurate La Some deficiencies in English but does not render study incomprehensible Presentation is acceptable Harvard referencing is accurate. Serious inadequacies where the meaning is unclear Presentation not to a business standard Does not confirm with Harvard conventions CamScanner Choose a company that your group is familiar with or your group can interview the relevant HR persons. Analyze and comment the human resources functions and performance of the investigated company, including the following: Human resource planning Recruitment approach Staff orientation Training and development Performance management and appraisal Compensation and motivation (Career Development) As group of consultants, you are required to comment the human resources performance and make recommendations to improve the effectiveness. Group Size: No more than 6 members . I student: 1,200 words (or above) Assessment Rubric (Group Project) Member List: Assessment Criteria: Distinction (10.9) Credit (8,7) Average (6,5) Failure (2.1) Marginal Pass (4.3) Content Introduction setting out the Paper (10%) Very comprehensive, and logical description Comprehensive and logical description Fairly comprehensive, and logical description A bit illogical description and insufficient coverage Discussion of the company and department background (10%) Very comprehensive, and critical discussion Comprehensive and critical discussion Fairly comprehensive and critical discussion A bit illogical discussion and insufficient coverage Illogical description and missing significant elements Illogical discussion and missing significant elements Illogical with very superficial or biased analysis Discussion and assessment of the Very comprehensive human resources practices and and logical discussion performance (40%) with in-depth and critical analysis Conclusion and recommendations Very conclusive, to the company to Improve the comprehensive, and human resources performance feasible (20%) Comprehensive and logical discussion with reasonably in-depth analysis Conclusive, comprehensive, and feasible Fairly comprehensive and logical discussion with analysis not in-depth enough Fairly conclusive, comprehensive and feasible Perspectives too narrow with a bit illogical: analysis tends to be superficial and with bias Perspectives too narrow with a bit illogical: analysis tends to be superficial and with bias Illogical with very superficial or biased analysis Organization and Presentation Appropriate report format and referencing (20%) Few and minor deficiencies in English Harvard referencing is complete and accurate throughout Excellent standard of written English Excellent presentation that professionally reflects business standards. Literatures cited are latest and comprehensive Harvard referencing is complete and accurate High standard of written English. Literatures cited are quite recent and comprehensive Literatures cited are quite recent and comprehensive Harvard referencing is complete and accurate La Some deficiencies in English but does not render study incomprehensible Presentation is acceptable Harvard referencing is accurate. Serious inadequacies where the meaning is unclear Presentation not to a business standard Does not confirm with Harvard conventions CamScanner