Amir bought a television from Corbel Electronics $($Corbel$)$ for $$999.$ Corbel offered a six$-$year warranty for any manufacturing defect in the television. After three years of use, the television caught on fire due to a manufacturing defect. The fire also damaged other items in Amir's house and the house itself. Which of the following is most accurate regarding Corbel$$s liability this scenario?

Group of answer choices

Amir can recover both liquidated damages and punitive damages.

Amir cannot recover damages for loss in value of the television set.

Amir can claim consequential damages for a breach of warranty resulting in damage to his property.

Amir's right to recover damages is barred by the Uniform Commercial Code's $($UCC$$s$)$ statute of limitations$.$