Amira signs a contract to work for TIP Tech for one year. Under the contract, TIP Tech cannot fire Amira without good cause. Two months into the contract, TIP Tech fires Amira for no reason at all, breaching the contract. Amira must mitigate her damages, which means she cannot just sit around doing nothing for the remaining $10$ months of the contract. She must attempt to find another job. If she is unable to do so within the remaining $10$ months, then TIP Tech is liable for all of the wages she would have earned under the contract. However, if Amira is able to find a new job after three months that pays the same as her old job, then TIP Tech is only liable for three months$$ worth of wages because Amira was able to mitigate her damages. How would you feel about this example if$,$ instead of firing Amira without cause, TIP Tech had dug deep into her personnel file to find some shred of a reason to fire her with cause? Is that OK to do$?$ If Amira is the victim of TIP Tech$$s breach, is it fair to require her to do the work to try to mitigate her damages? Why or why not? If Amira is immediately able to find a new job, would it be fair for TIP Tech not to have to pay any damages at all? Why or why not?