Question: am's Pet Hotel operates 5 2 weeks per year, 5 days per week, and uses a continuous review inventory system. It purchases kitty litter for

am's Pet Hotel operates 52 weeks per year, 5 days per week, and uses a continuous review inventory system. It purchases kitty litter for $10.50 per bag. The following information is available about these bags. Refer to the standard normal tableLOADING... for z-values.
followsDemand =100bags/week
followsOrder cost=$56/order
followsAnnual holding cost=28 percent of cost
followsDesired cycle-service levelequals98 percent
followsLead time=1week(s)(5 working days)
followsStandard deviation of weekly demand=18 bags
followsCurrent on-hand inventory is 315bags, with no open orders or backorders.
Part 2
a. What is the EOQ?
Sam's optimal order quantity is
enter your response here bags. (Enter your response rounded to the nearest whole number.)
Part 3
What would be the average time between orders(in weeks)?
The average time between orders is
enter your response here weeks. (Enter your response rounded to one decimal place.)
Part 4
b. What should R be?
The reorder point is
enter your response here bags. (Enter your response rounded to the nearest whole number.)
Part 5
c. An inventory withdrawal of 10 bags was just made. Is it time to reorder?
It
is
is not
time to reorder.
Part 6
d. The store currently uses a lot size of 490 bags(i.e., Qequals490). What is the annual holding cost of this policy?
The annual holding cost is $
enter your response here. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.)
Part 7
What is the annual ordering cost?
The annual ordering cost is $
enter your response here. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.)
Part 8
Without calculating the EOQ, how can you conclude from these two calculations that the current lot size is too large?
A.
When Q=490, the annual holding cost is less then the ordering cost, therefore Q is too small.
B.
When Q=490, the annual holding cost is larger than the ordering cost, therefore Q is too large.
C.
There is not enough information to determine this.
D.
Both quantities are appropriate.
Part 9
e. What would be the annual cost saved by shifting from the 490-bag lot size to the EOQ?
The annual holding cost with the EOQ is $
enter your response here. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.)
Part 10
The annual ordering cost with the EOQ is $
enter your response here. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.)
Part 11
Therefore, Sam's Pet Hotel saves $
enter your response here by shifting from the 490-bag lot size to the EOQ. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.)
Sam's optimal order quantity isbags.The average time between orders isweeks.The reorder point isbags.Ittime to reorder.The annual holding cost is $.(Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.The annual ordering cost is $.(Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.Without calculating the EOQ, how can you conclude from these two calculations that the current lot size is too large?The annual holding cost with the EOQ is $.(Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.The annual ordering cost with the EOQ is $.(Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.Therefore, Sam's Pet Hotel saves $490

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!