An ambiguous contract O a. Can be interpreted in more than one way. O b. Does not clearly explain the intent of the parties. Oc Is missing an important term O d. These are all ways that a contract may be ambiguous Which of the following would not be Extrinsic Evidence? O a. The plaintiff's complaint alleging their version of what happened. O b. Prior negotiations between the parties. O c. Prior versions of the contract. O d. Witness testimony about what was said when the parties were negotiating the contract. In which of the following situations would Parol Evidence not be allowed? O a. The contract is ambiguous or incomplete. O b. The contract was subsequently modified. . The contract is voidable due to lack of voluntary consent. O d. The contract can be interpreted based on its plain language. Which of the following is an example of an exception to the Parol Evidence Rule? O a. On January 15, Merchants sign a written contract for the sale goods. On January 20, they agree to draft a new contract. Both contracts may be admitted as evidence. O b. A purchases goods which will be delivered on a commercial vessel called Lusitania. Unbeknownst to A and the Seller, there are two ships called Lusitania. Information about the two boats, as well as prior negotiations between the parties about the delivery, may be admitted as evidence. . Landowner enters into a written contract with construction company to build an office building. The two orally agree that the contract is conditional on the City giving a zoning variance. This oral condition may be introduced as evidence. O d. They are all exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule. O e. None of them are exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule