An expert witness uses regression$/$correlation analysis to evaluate the operating expenses of a client charged in an antitrust case. The results that are found do not match the expectations of the expert and the accounting professionals at the firm. A logical explanation for this might be: Bookmark this question A$)$ The company allocates some costs to operating expenses in an arbitrary way B$)$ Some expenses for marketing services are transferred to the division's operating expenses on an annual basis C$)$ The company's accounting policies call for charging depreciation to business units only once a year D$)$ All of the situations above might cause costs to "behave" in a fashion that was not expected by the expert or accounting professionals of the company E$)$ None of the above