An implication from these data is that discrimination training: Percent 50 total responses 40 Standard training...

 

Transcribed Image Text:

An implication from these data is that discrimination training: Percent 50 total responses 40 Standard training S(1,000-Hz tone) R (key peck) +0 (food) !! 30 20 Discrimination training S(1.000-Hz tone)+R (key peck) +0 (food) S (950-Hz tone) +R (key peck)+0 ino food) 10 300 450 670 1,000 1,500 2,250 3,500 Tonal frequency (in Hertz) broadens responding to more stimuli slows down learning sharpens sensitivity to the stimulus has no effect on responses speeds responses An implication from these data is that discrimination training: Percent 50 total responses 40 Standard training S(1,000-Hz tone) R (key peck) +0 (food) !! 30 20 Discrimination training S(1.000-Hz tone)+R (key peck) +0 (food) S (950-Hz tone) +R (key peck)+0 ino food) 10 300 450 670 1,000 1,500 2,250 3,500 Tonal frequency (in Hertz) broadens responding to more stimuli slows down learning sharpens sensitivity to the stimulus has no effect on responses speeds responses

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

From the two curves shown in the diagram the blue one is showing ... View the full answer