Analysis Depth 30 pts Exemplar Exceeds expectations with exceptional clarity, depth, and insight. Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding and application of course concepts and external resources to analyze required KSAOs and individual differences based on the job ad. 22 pts Good Meets expectations with good clarity and depth. Solid understanding and application of course concepts to the analysis. 14 pts Satisfactory Meets basic expectations with some clarity and depth, but lacks detail in some areas. Adequate understanding of course concepts. 6 pts Needs Improvement Below expectations with minimal clarity, depth, and understanding. Analysis lacks detail and insight. 0 pts Unsatisfactory/No Submission Fails to meet basic expectations with little to no clarity or depth. Minimal or no analysis provided. Or, assignment not submitted. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Justification of KSAOs 25 pts Exemplar Provides compelling and thorough justifications for each KSAO and trait, demonstrating how they align with the job's requirements. 20 pts Good Justifications are sound and mostly aligned with the job requirements, with some areas lacking full development. 12 pts Satisfactory Justifications are adequate but not fully developed. Some alignment with job requirements, but lacks detail. 6 pts Needs Improvement Justifications are minimal or superficial, and/or poorly align with job requirements. 0 pts Unsatisfactory/No Submission Justifications for KSAOs and traits are missing, irrelevant, or fail to demonstrate alignment with job requirements. Assign