analyze the cases in the Questions and Problems.

Case 6

, write an analysis of the issue based on the following criteria: Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).

Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns. Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties).

Provide a judgment on who should win the case - be clear. Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.

Be prepared to defend your decision and to objectively evaluate the other points of view.

The Garden City Boxing Club held exclusive satellite licensing rights for a live broadcast of a boxing match between Oscar De La Hoya and Fernando Vargas. Luis Dominguez owned Antenas Enterprises, the installer of a satellite account at Mundelein Burrito restaurant. However, Antenas listed Mundelein Burrito as a residence instead of a commercial location. A commercial establishment could show the boxing match only if it was contractually authorized by GCB to do so and if it paid the appropriate fee of $20 times the maximum fire code occupancy of the establishment. Mundelein Burrito showed the event to its patrons. However, because Mundelein Burrito was classified as a residence, it did not pay the proper fee for a commercial establishment. The Garden City Boxing Club filed suit against Dominguez, the sole proprietor of Antenas, to collect the lost fees from the boxing match. As a sole proprietor, should Dominguez be held personally liable for Antenas Enterprises' actions? [Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. Luis Dominguez. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38184 (2006).] The Garden City Boxing Club held exclusive satellite licensing rights for a live broadcast of a boxing match between Oscar De La Hoya and Fernando Vargas. Luis Dominguez owned Antenas Enterprises, the installer of a satellite account at Mundelein Burrito restaurant. However, Antenas listed Mundelein Burrito as a residence instead of a commercial location. A commercial establishment could show the boxing match only if it was contractually authorized by GCB to do so and if it paid the appropriate fee of $20 times the maximum fire code occupancy of the establishment. Mundelein Burrito showed the event to its patrons. However, because Mundelein Burrito was classified as a residence, it did not pay the proper fee for a commercial establishment. The Garden City Boxing Club filed suit against Dominguez, the sole proprietor of Antenas, to collect the lost fees from the boxing match. As a sole proprietor, should Dominguez be held personally liable for Antenas Enterprises' actions? [Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. Luis Dominguez. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38184 (2006).]