Answer Part 3: Do you believe that you employed an Intellectual Alibi when asked to describe the process you utilized to arrive at your decision? evaluation

Part 1 Your choice: Brand A Now that you have chosen Brand A or Brand B (you have, haven't you?), please describe the evaluation process you utilized to arrive at your decision: This evaluation process is predicated on making quick choices. The evaluation process goes as follows: Firstly, I confirmed that my need was for a beige color carpet, and both brands meet my basic needs. Secondly, I do not have a strict budget limit for product purchases. Third, I did a quick comparison of brand A and brand B with the only information available and found that the difference between the two after discounting was not significant. So, with less stringent budget constraints, I tend to prefer Brand A because its original price is higher and the quality may be better. I am not sensitive to the price difference between A and B after discounting. Part 2 Do you believe that you employed a decision-making heuristic in choosing Brand A versus Brand B? I believe I used a decision-making heuristic in choosing Brand A versus Brand B. Because of the insufficient information and time constraints, I have evaluated the possible factors in the condition constraints. My decisions are based on my primary needs and reasonable speculation about the relationship between quality and price based on my personal buying experience. Part 3 Do you believe that you employed an Intellectual Alibi when asked to "describe the evaluation process you utilized to arrive at your decision? +