answer question 7and 8 with in text and end text citation with reference in apa7th style with latest five years refernecessary with 250words counts and 3 referenoses.

[Q1] What is your improved/ enhanced/ reimagined product or service?

What task does it perform?

We will rework the EduCycle summary, ensuring it answers clearly what task it

performs (solving school equipment gaps + plastic waste).

[Q2] What makes your improved/ enhanced/ reimagined product or

service significantly different and more effective than the original proposal?

We will contrast EduCycle vs Drastic Plastic, showing:

Added value (school furniture vs general recycling),

Modular + durable design,

Educational + traceable impact.

[Q3] What makes it different and better than substitute/ competitor

solutions?

This will include:

QR-based transparency,

School-specific design,

Long-term cost reduction.

[Q4] How did you and your group members develop/ agree upon your

improved/ enhanced/ reimagined product or service? (Methodology)

Based on Design Thinking Empathize Define Ideate Prototype Test

(already outlined, will polish it).

[Q5] Who are your potential customers and why would they want your

product or service?

We will include:

Primary/secondary schools,

Gov. education departments,

NGOs/donors.[Q6] Why are you and your group members the best placed to develop this

product or service solution?

We'll strengthen this with:

Your team's combined backgrounds (education + sustainability),

Personal motivation,

Youth-led innovation advantage.

[Q7] In developing your product or service, what risks would you

anticipate?

Already well done we'll fine-tune risks like:

Quality perception,

Raw material sourcing,

Adoption hesitancy.

[Q8] Why is your product or service deserving of investment?

We'll use:

SDG alignment (12, 13, 4),

Long-term savings for schools,

Replicability and scalabilit