Answer the case questions, and answer 1-5 true/false and explain.

i\": 'LV. Design Chap 7 Outline ~ Contract Enforceability and Performance - Protected View - Saved to this PC Layout References Mailings Review View Help 9 Search Case 7.5: Emmelyn LoganBaldwin v. L.S.M General Contractors, Inc, 942 N.Y.S.2d 718 (NY. 2012) (p. 227) Facts: Logan-Baldwin and other owners (collectively LoganBaldwin) contracted with L.S.M. General Contractors (LSM) to renovate a historic residence. LSM subcontracted to Henry lsaacs Home Remodeling (lsaacs) to perform roong work as part of the renovations. Isaacs then contracted with Brewster to install a new roof on the residence. Soon after the roof was completed it showed signs of leaking and it became clear that the roof was not installed correctly. LSM and Isaacs attempted to x the problems= but were unsuccessful and subsequently abandoned the project. LoganBaldwin hired other contractors to x the problem and sued LSM, Isaacs= and Brewster for breach of contract. Isaacs defended that he did not directly contract with LoganBaldwin and therefore cannot be sued for breach of contract. Issues: Does Logan-Baldwin have contract rights over Isaacs as an intended third-party beneciary? ' Ruling: Yes. LoganB aldwin, as the owners of the house= were logically the intended beneciary of the home renovations and have rights as a third party beneciary. Since they were intended thirdparty beneciaries, the court ruled that LogamBaldWin had the right to ' maintain a breach of contract claim against Isaac's. Ma's Destgn Lliap 3' Outline ~ Contract Enforceability and Performance - Protected "ew ' Saved to this PC Layout References Mailings Review View Help- bcneciary of the home renovations and have rights as a third party beneciary. Since they were intended thirdparty beneciaries, the court ruled that Logan-Baldwin had the right to maintain a breach of contract claim against Isaacs. Answers to Case Questions 1. Does an intended beneciary have to be named in a contract to have rights to enforce the contract? 2. \"Thy did the court rule that Logan-Baldwin had a right to sue for breach of contract? 3. Suppose that the plaintiffs historical resitlemce was typically open to the public for tours on weekends. Philip, a history buff, plans a trip to tour the home, but upon his arrival he nds it closed because the shoddy roong work made the premises unsafe for the public. Does Philip have a cause o'f action against any of the defendants? 1. Because Henry Isaacs delegated its duty to repa the roof to Brewster, Henry : Isaacs remains responsible for Brewster's failure to install the new roof on the : residence propel-1i, 2. LoganEdam 15 entitled to compensatory amages mg the cost of hiring a other contractors to x the roof} caused by the breach of contract by LSM and _ LoganBaldwin qualied as a third party creditor bene ' nary ofthe contract between LEM and Henry Isaacs anti the contract betweenI-Iemr lsaacs and Brewster even if LoganBald ' N ' novation= Henry Isaacs is not liable for Beach installthenew roof uro erl . ' ~