Answer the following business law question using IRAC: Issue, Rule, Analysis/Application, Conclusion.

Mr. and Mrs. Ferlito attended a Halloween party with Mrs. Ferlito dressed as Mary and Mr Ferlito dressed as her little lamb. Mrs. Ferlito had constructed a lamb costume by gluing cotton batting manufactured by Johnson and Johnson products to a suit of long underwear. The lamb costume covered Mr. Ferlito from his head to his ankles, except for his face and hands, which were blackened with Halloween paint. At the party, Mr. Ferlito attempted to light his cigarette by using a butane lighter. The flames passed close to his left arm and the cotton batting on his sleeve ignited. Mr. and Mrs. Ferlito sued Johnson & Johnson products for injuries they suffered from burns that covered approximately one-third of Mr. Ferlitos body. The Ferlitos claimed that Johnson & Johnson failed to warn purchasers of this cotton batting that it was flammable. The jury returned a verdict of $555,000 for Mr. Ferlito and $70,000 for Mrs. Ferlito. Johnson & Johnson moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. What will Johnson & Johnson argue? What will Mr. and Mrs. Ferlito argue? How do you think the court should rule?