Question: answer the following: No need for solution 35-44: Bluegrass Farm has been experimenting with a special diet for its racehorses. The feed components available for

answer the following: No need for solution

answer the following: No need for solution 35-44:

answer the following: No need for solution 35-44:

answer the following: No need for solution 35-44:

answer the following: No need for solution 35-44:

answer the following: No need for solution 35-44:

answer the following: No need for solution 35-44:

35-44: Bluegrass Farm has been experimenting with a special diet for its racehorses. The feed components available for the diet are a standard horse feed product (X1), an enriched oat product (X2), and a new vitamin and mineral feed additive (X3). The nutritional values in units per pound and the costs for the three feed components are shown in the table below: Feed component Standard Enriched oat Additive Ingredient A 0.8 0.2 0.0 Ingredient B 1.0 1.5 3.0 Ingredient 0.1 0.6 2.0 Coast per pound $0.25 $0.50 $3.00 The minimum daily diet requirements for each horse are 3 units of ingredient A, 6 units of ingredient B, and four units of ingredient C. In addition, to control the weight of the horses, the total daily feed for a horse should not exceed 6 pounds. Blue grass farm would like to determine the minimum-cost mix that will satisfy the daily diet requirements. The output of the Management Scientist for this problem is shown below. The constraints are defined as follows: Constraint 1: Daily diet requirement for Ingredient A Constraint 2: Daily diet requirement for Ingredient B Constraint 3: Daily diet requirement for Ingredient Constraint 4: Total daily feed Objective Function Value - 5.973 Value Variable X1 X2 X3 3.514 0.946 1.541 Slack/Surplus Reduced Costs 0.000 0.000 0.000 Constraint 1 0.000 3.554 0.000 0.000 Dual Prices -1.216 0.000 -1.959 0.919 Current Value 0.250 0.500 3.000 Upper Limit No Upper Limit 0.925 No Upper Limit OBJECTIVE COEFFICIENT RANGES Variable Lover Linit X1 -0.393 X2 No Lover Limit X3 1.522 RIGHT HAND SIDE RANGES Constraint Lover Limit 1 1.143 No Lover Limit 2.100 5.563 Current Value Upper Limit 2 3.000 6.000 4.000 6.000 3.368 9.554 4.875 8.478 41. Increasing the right hand side of constraint 4 from 6 to 8 will decrease/increase total cost by: decrease by $1.84 increase by $1.84 decrease by $0.92 increase by $0.92 42. The optimal solution will not change even if: The cost of enriched oat product is increased by $0.5 The cost of the standard feed and mineral additive will increase. The cost of the mineral additive is decreased by $1.5. The cost of enriched oat is increased by $0.93 43. By how much can the RHS of the constraint on ingredient C be increased in order for the optimal solution to remain the same? 0.875 3.554 0 2.478 O 0.368 44. By how much can the RHS of the constraint on ingredient B be decreased so as not to cause change in the optimal solution? O 1.875 no limit 1.9 O 0.438

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!