Answer the following questions from the case study. What is Lockes views on property? What would he think about coping the CDs? The unanswered question here is whether the CD being copied is copyright protected, in other words, whether this is a piracy case. Assume it is. If retardedchicken had to fill out an ethical argument against CD piracy that relied on either the perennial duties or Kant, what could he say? While over stand may be pirating, no one doubts that the original disc is legitimately his. Maybe he bought it or maybe someone gave it to him; either way, whats the libertarian argument against retarded chicken? How could a libertarian justify over stands copying? Would a libertarian believe that the company producing the disc has a right to lace it with code that makes duplication impossible? Explain. It sounds like Clone CD is specifically made to help pirates get around the copyright protections manufacturers put on their discs. Whats the Kantian case for condemning Clone CD for their project? Whats the libertarian case for congratulating them? Which of the two cases is stronger? Why? Retardedchicken implies that overstand is a thief and -=iNsAnE=- calls retardedchickens post worthless crap. Flipside calls - =iNsAnE=- a mongloid. Is there an ethical case that can be made against the tone of this discussion?