Answer the question below. Your answer should be supported with relevant sections from Statute of law and Case Law Alex decides to sell his limited-edition Range Rover and is considering buying a smaller vehicle due to petrol prices increasing dramatically in recent months. Alex places an advertisement in his car window on 1st June stating: 'Range Rover excellent condition, first owner RM85K or nearest offer'. Please contact Alex on 0123456789 if you are interested. Michael, Alex's neighbor, seeing the advertisement earlier that day, decides to contact Alex that evening, and arranges to inspect the vehicle. After checking the car, Michael states that he will contact him if he's still interested. On 3rd June, Chloe calls Alex's mobile number after inspecting the vehicle (the previous day) and offers RM80K. Alex is delighted and says, 'how about RM83K?Chloe states that she will need to discuss this with her husband, Alex tells her to call back at 6 pm. Chloe contacts Alex on his mobile phone at 7.30 pm; however, the phone switched off. Chloe did not leave a message. Chloe tries to call Alex's at his work number the following day: however, Alex is at a conference, so she leaves a message on his answering machine, stating that she wants the Range Rover for RM83K. Alex doesn't return to his desk until late that afternoon and fails to listen to his answering machine that day. Vishnu, a dedicated car dealer, contacts Alex the next day (4th June), on his mobile phone, stating that he's interested in the vehicle, and arranges to meet Alex during his lunch break to inspect the car. Alex meets Vishnu and accepts an offer of RM85K from Vishnu. Michael and Chloe contact Alex the next day (5th June) demanding the vehicle for the advertised price. Name and describe the court which is empowered to hear such an application. Why this court is suitable for this legal issue? Explain. Answer the question below. Your answer should be supported with relevant sections from Statute of law and Case Law Alex decides to sell his limited-edition Range Rover and is considering buying a smaller vehicle due to petrol prices increasing dramatically in recent months. Alex places an advertisement in his car window on 1st June stating: 'Range Rover excellent condition, first owner RM85K or nearest offer'. Please contact Alex on 0123456789 if you are interested. Michael, Alex's neighbor, seeing the advertisement earlier that day, decides to contact Alex that evening, and arranges to inspect the vehicle. After checking the car, Michael states that he will contact him if he's still interested. On 3rd June, Chloe calls Alex's mobile number after inspecting the vehicle (the previous day) and offers RM80K. Alex is delighted and says, 'how about RM83K?Chloe states that she will need to discuss this with her husband, Alex tells her to call back at 6 pm. Chloe contacts Alex on his mobile phone at 7.30 pm; however, the phone switched off. Chloe did not leave a message. Chloe tries to call Alex's at his work number the following day: however, Alex is at a conference, so she leaves a message on his answering machine, stating that she wants the Range Rover for RM83K. Alex doesn't return to his desk until late that afternoon and fails to listen to his answering machine that day. Vishnu, a dedicated car dealer, contacts Alex the next day (4th June), on his mobile phone, stating that he's interested in the vehicle, and arranges to meet Alex during his lunch break to inspect the car. Alex meets Vishnu and accepts an offer of RM85K from Vishnu. Michael and Chloe contact Alex the next day (5th June) demanding the vehicle for the advertised price. Name and describe the court which is empowered to hear such an application. Why this court is suitable for this legal issue? Explain