answer to first part is : its voilation, hence written againstbthe statement. please answer the consequences in terms of business law. In this case, I am going to ask you to reflect on a public Facebook page posting by a university student who wrote, no longer fear Hell , I took a course with Professor [Smith)." Two or three students in each group are going to write a two-to-three-page double spaced statement discussing whether they think it is right that a student should be able to post such a public statement in writing or whether alternatively such an action is a violation of the professor's rights. You may take either position, but you must take a position one way or the other and stay with it. You must provide two independent reasons to justify your position. This two to three-page document must be dropped into the drop box at 11:59 am, the Monday before the class one week after the assignment is distributed (i.e., 11:59 a.m. the Monday before class in week # 11). This portion will be marked out of 4 marks. Then, the remainder of the students in each group will have until 11:59 a.m. the Monday before the next class (l.e., 11:59 am, the Monday before class # 12) to discuss the consequences of the position taken in the first part of the paper in terms of consequences for students, professors, and education at universities as a whole, and the consequences for other situations where these same rights come into play. In addition, the second part of the group will provide one positive comment about the content of the first part of the paper and one area where they think there could be