Question: AP10.7 (LO 8) PPS sampling Edwards has decided to use probability-proportional-to-size (PPS) sampling in the audit of a client's accounts receivable balance. Few, if any,
AP10.7 (LO 8) PPS sampling Edwards has decided to use probability-proportional-to-size (PPS) sampling in the audit of a client's accounts receivable balance. Few, if any, errors of overstatement are expected.
Edwards plans to use the following PPS sampling table:
| 5% RELIABILITY FACTORS FOR OVERSTATEMENTS | ||||||||||
| Number of Overstatements | Risk of Incorrect Acceptance | |||||||||
| 1% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | ||||||
| 0 | 4.61 | 3.00 | 2.31 | 1.90 | 1.61 | |||||
| 1 | 6.64 | 4.75 | 3.89 | 3.38 | 3.00 | |||||
| 2 | 8.41 | 6.30 | 5.33 | 4.72 | 4.28 | |||||
| 3 | 10.05 | 7.76 | 6.69 | 6.02 | 5.52 | |||||
| 4 | 11.61 | 9.16 | 8.00 | 7.27 | 6.73 | |||||
Required
- a. Identify the advantages of using PPS sampling over classical variables sampling.
- b. Calculate the sampling interval and the sample size Edwards should use, given the following information:
Tolerable misstatement $15,000
Risk of incorrect acceptance 5%
Number of misstatements allowed 0
Recorded amount of accounts receivable $300,000
- c. Calculate total projected misstatement if the following three misstatements were discovered in a PPS sample:
Recorded Amount Audit Amount Sampling Interval 1st misstatement $ 400
$ 320
$1,000 2nd misstatement 500
0
1,000 3rd misstatement 3,000
2,500
1,000
(AICPA adapted)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
