Applying Legal Concepts

Part 3: Case StudyIRAC Analysis andDiscussion Assignment (Module 1.6):

InPart 3,you will participate in theDiscussion Assignmentwith your classmates.Postingthe Mini-Case's IRAC Analysis(below) in theDiscussion, you will build a discussion based on your IRAC Analysis (format is provided below). Thefocus of the Discussion is,"Why you Concluded that the case Facts and the main Issue supports the Elements identified in your IRAC Analysis?"

Mini-Case:

1. XYA Corporation discovered that ZZZ Inc., a competitor, is producing a new widget gadget. XYA believed that the widget gadget contained parts owned by XYA under their patent. XYA filed a lawsuit in Federal Court asking for expedited review to grant an injunction against ZZZ to stop the imminent escalation of production. As a part of the preliminary hearing in Federal court, XYA petitioned the court to obtain a copy of the official gadget blueprint specifications to determine if the case should continue. Under what procedure would XYA be permitted to receive the plans?

IRAC Analysis Format:

Facts:

ISSUE:

RULE of LAW:

ANALYSIS:

CONCLUSION: