Question: Are failed tests always indicative of process failures? Select one: a. There's not enough information available to answer the question. b. Yes, failed tests always
Are failed tests always indicative of process failures? Select one: a. There's not enough information available to answer the question. b. Yes, failed tests always indicative of process failures. c. No, data above the control range tracked always represents more efficient processes and the range should then be increased. d. Not necessarily, sometimes the "failed" data represents efficiencies above or below the test parameters
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
