Are the results statistically significant ? explain Did the authors correctly interpret the results Are the results clinically significant as well? - explain The findings indicated that the control group had an 80% excess risk of having moderate to severe pain during IV cannulation compared to the kaleidoscope group. In terms of relative risk, the kaleidoscope had reduced the risk of moderate to severe pain by 75%. The calculated NNT was 1.25. It was also evident that the control group had a 60% excess risk of having moderate to severe discomfort during IV cannulation compared to the Kaleidoscope group. In terms of relative risk, the kaleidoscope reduced the risk of moderate to severe discomfort by 69%. The calculated NNT was 1.67. The median pain score was zero for the experimental group and eight (IQR 4) for the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). The median behavioural response score was zero (IQR 1) and five (IQR 3) for the experimental and control groups and that difference had statistical significance (p<0.001)