ARTICLE LINK

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/21-476

In 303 CREATIVE LLC v. ELENIS | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu) a website designer sued Colorado arguing the public accommodation law violated her free speech rights - she only wanted to make wedding websites for opposite sex couples. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of web designer in a 6-3 decision in essence agreeing with the web designer that the State cannot force you to speak its preferred message. Doing so violates her free speech rights under the Constitution's First Amendment.

1. Does either the Masterpiece Cake Shop or 303 Creative LLC change public accommodation rights, why or why not? (You must describe public accommodation rights in your answer.)

2. Why is 303 Creative LLC a free speech case?

3. You agree or disagree that someone who performs creative services, such as a graphic artist, baker, website designer, etc. can refuse to perform such services for same sex couples, why or why not?