As you analyze constructive arguments to determine how they can be used to solve problems and manage risks in a criminal justice context, respond to the following: Which of these 5 strategies of constructive arguments do you feel are most important for a detective conducting an interview of a suspect or witness? Here are the five steps choice (Listening carefully to other points of view, Supporting views with reasons and evidence, Responding to the points being made, Askingand trying to answerappropriate questions, Working to increase understanding, not simply to "win the argument") How might the strategy or strategies you selected help a detective solve problems or mitigate risk during investigations or interrogations? Reflect on what you have learned about extended arguments. Which critical thinking traits are most relevant when developing written or spoken extended arguments?Note: Consider reviewing the 10 personal traits of an effective thinker in Ch. 2, "Thinking Critically," inThinking Critically. Here are the critical thinking traits( Open-minded, Knowledgeable, mentally active, Curious, Independent thinkers, Skilled Discussants, Insightful, Self-aware, Creative, Passionate) How might developing written or spoken extended arguments help you mitigate risk or solve problems in the criminal justice career you would like to pursue