Assessment 3

Assessment type: Ethical analysis individual assignment (1,500 words)

Purpose: This assessment will allow students to conduct the ethical analysis of a situation provided by them and approved by tutor. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes a and b.

Value: 15%Due Date: Week 5 Sunday midnight

Topic: Students need to identify maximum four situations in the department allocated as per your student ID. Analyse them based on any four ethical philosophies taught to you in this unit. Students will demonstrate that they can identify, assess and analyse the situation.

Task Details:

Background: Colodo is a global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of products found in items people use every day. With the purpose of enhancing the quality of life in a material way, Colodo works with customers to deliver innovative products and solutions while maintaining a commitment to safety and sustainability. The company's innovation-driven growth model takes advantage of world-class technology platforms, deep customer engagement, and differentiated application development to grow its leading positions in attractive end-markets such as transportation, building and construction, and consumables. As a globally inclusive and diverse company, Colodo employs approximately 14,500 people around the world and serves customers in more than 100 countries. At Colodo, quality is at the core of their success. It is an important part of their legacy, culture, and brand. They strive to run all processes reliably and to the desired targets while avoiding the costs of poor quality.

Colodo team members are committed to doing it right the first time, every time, guided by key principles. Customer Focus, Market Focus, Relationships, Leadership, Improvement, Process Focus, Scientific Method and Learning.

Departments

Department 1: The Production function undertakes the activities necessary to provide the organisations products or services. Its main responsibilities are: production planning and scheduling control and supervision of the production workforce managing product quality (including process control and monitoring maintenance of plant and equipment

control of inventory deciding the best production methods and factory layout.

Students will prepare a business style report of approximately 1500 words which analyses the above scenario through the lens of any of the FOUR (4) ethical philosophies presented in lecture.

A suggested report structure is as follows. title page executive summary table of contents introduction ethical analysis conclusion references appendices

Submission requirements details: This task needs to be submitted by Week 5 Sunday midnight on Moodle. Please submit an electronic copy only in Microsoft Word or .pdf format via Moodle. Please refer to the Subject Outline for information regarding late assignments, extensions, special consideration, and plagiarism.

Assessment 3 Marking Rubric: Ethical Analysis Value 15%

CriteriaFailPassCreditDistinctionHigh DistinctionWeighting (0 - 49%)(50 - 64%)(65 - 74%)(75 - 84%)(85 - 100%)% Evidence of researchLess than 6 relevant titles read.At least 6-8 relevant titles read.At least 8-12 relevant titles read.More than 12 relevant titles read.More than 15 relevant titles read.15 Relevance of content:Incomplete analysis and no clear identification of relevant ethical issues.Satisfactory analysis and identification of some relevant ethical issues.Accurate analysis and identification of most relevant ethical issues.Accurate analysis and identification of all relevant ethical issues.Compelling analysis and identification of all relevant ethical issues.25 Application of concepts and principles:Analysis is not supported. Assumptions made are not noted.Analysis is minimally supported. Assumptions made are not all noted.Analysis is well supported . All assumptions made are noted.Analysis is very well supported All assumptions made are noted.Analysis is extremely well supported. All assumptions made are noted and explained.25 Clarity of Structure:The structure of the report is unclear and not logical. It does not address the brief. Use of headings unsatisfactory.The structure of the report is logical in parts. It addresses most of the assignment brief. Use of headings satisfactory.Report structure is easy to read and logical, directly addressing assignment brief. Suitable headings used.Report structure is easy to read and logical, directly addressing assignment brief. Clear headings used throughout.Report structure is easy to read and compelling, directly addressing assignment brief. Relevant headings used throughout.10 WritingA large number of spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors.Several spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors.Some spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors.Minor spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors.No spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors.10 Correct referencing:Referencing not done to standard. Over-use of direct quotes. Range of sources used is not relevant and/or not documented.No more than 4 errors. Direct quotes over-used. Sources documented.No more than 2 referencing errors. Direct quotes used sparingly. Sources documented.No referencing errors. Direct quotes used sparingly. Sources documented.No referencing errors. Direct quotes used sparingly and only when needed. Sources documented.15

Note: can i please get this answer with reference also as soon as possible because i got only 3hrs to submit . please help on it