Assessment	When assessed	Weighting	Learning Outcomes
Assessment 2: Online e-Resource Development (1500 words equivalent) Develop two learning sequences and lesson plans that demonstrate intentional teaching and scaffolding. Plan learning and do a lesson plan for diverse learners aged 0-5 and 3-5 and are inclusive of indigenous children. You can use STEAM and/or language and literacy themes. Please use the APA7 referencing style.	Week 12	30%	A - C

Marks Criteria	High Distinction 80%-100%	Distinction 70%-79%	Credit 60%-69%	Pass 50%-59%	Fail 0-49%
Learning	Excellent, highly	Very good learning	Good learning experiences for	Adequate learning	In appropriate learning
	appropriate learning	experiences for selected	selected learners.	experiences for selected	experiences for selected
Experiences	experiences for selected	learners.	Good integration of research	learners.	learners.
	learners.	Very good integration of	findings to the learning	Adequate integration of	Inadequate integration of
/30	Extensive integration of	research findings to the	design.	research findings to the	research findings to the
	research findings to the learning design.	learning design.		learning design.	learning design.
	(24-30)	(21-23.9)	(18-20.9)	( 15-17)	(0-14.9)
Knowledge:	Excellent understanding of	Very good understanding of	Good understanding of the	Adequate understanding of	Inadequate understanding
	the question.	the question.	question.	the question.	of the question.
Understanding of topic	Excellent evaluation of concepts, issues and	Very good evaluation of concepts, issues and	Good evaluation of concepts, issues and information.	Adequate evaluation of concepts, issues and	Inadequate evaluation of concepts, issues and
	information.	information.	Very well researched.	information.	information.
/30	Evidence of extensive research	Very well researched.		Adequate research evident.	No/inadequate research evident.
	(24-30)	(21-23.9)	(18-20.9)	(15-17)	(0-14.9)

TEQSA Provider Number PRV14066 | CRICOS Provider Code 03739K | ABN Number 79 605 294 997 | Copyright 2020. All rights reserved

Style: Grammar and expression /20	Planner is clearly written in professional language and high quality layout Significance of examples and quotes clearly stated. Excellent use of language and expression. (16-20)	Planner is written with formal language and well-designed layout Significance of examples and quotes clearly stated most of the time. Very good use of language and expression. (14-15.5)	Planner is adequately provided with some inconsistencies in layout and design not relevant to planner Language is sometimes informal and not relevant to the planner Good use of language and expression. (12-13.5)	Planner contains many errors Layout and design is not consistent or relevant to assignment Language is often informal. Significance of examples and quotes is unclear. Adequate use of language and expression. (10-11)	No evidence of planner Language is consistently informal with no relevance to the assignment No or few examples or quotes used. (0-9)
Citations and references /20	Excellent citations and references. Excellent critical analysis of selected references. (16-20)	Very good citations and references. Very good critical analysis of selected references. (14-15.5)	Good citations and references. Good critical analysis of selected references. (12-13.5)	Adequate citations and references. Adequate critical analysis of selected references. (10-11)	Inadequate citations and references. No critical analysis of selected references. (0-9)