Assignment #3 5%, Case Studies

Royal Bank V Samson Management page 160 and Wilmot page 200

DUE: July 6, 8:29 AM

by yourself, or in a group of up to four, u

se the case study deconstruction method discussed in LO 2 and in our ZOOM meeting of June 9

and deconstruct the Royal Bank V Samson Management page 160 and Wilmot page 200 cases.

Steps to take:

1 discuss by yourself or in your group what the possible legal issues are, implications could be, and how you could best answer the questions

for the case study

2 identify the legal issues and/or torts/laws. For example, in the case study of Claire and the car accident, the legal issue is contributory

negligence.

3 define the legal issues and/or torts/laws. For example, in the case study of Claire, define what contributory negligence is.

4 give examples from the case study that supports the legal issues and/or torts/laws. Be specific. For example, say Claire is could be negligent

because she could have contributed to her injuries by not wearing her seatbelt. Not wearing her seatbelt is an example of contributory

negligence.

5 write up your report using complete sentences, good grammar, spelling, etc. Make sure you provide FACTS only!

6 -

submit the assignment to the dropbox or via email. Your assignment MUST be in a Word document o