Assignment outcomes

This assignment is aligned to the following specific outcomes and assessment criteria:

$\backslash$table$[[$Specific outcomes,Assessment criteria$],[\backslash$table$[[$Discuss the meaning of the$],[$term "enterprise$],[$architecture$"($EA$),$ and the$],[$aims and basic principles of$],[$EA$.]],\backslash$table$[[-$ The background and historical development of EA are outlined.$],[-$ The benefits provided by EA are identified in terms of the$],[$following key elements: governance, methodology, best$],[$practices$,$ framework, artefacts, and repository.$]]],[\backslash$table$[[$Compile a comparative tool$],[$for EA frameworks and$],[$select a suitable framework$],[$for a particular situation.$]],\backslash$table$[[-$ A descriptive overview is provided of the main features of$],[$mainstream EA frameworks. The frameworks must be in use at$],[$the time the description is compiled and may include:$],[$a$)$ The Zachman Framework for Enterprise Architecture$],[$b$)$ The Open Group Architecture Framework $($TOGAF$)],[$c$)$ The Department of Defense Architecture Framework$],[($DoDAF$)],[-$ The descriptive overview includes at least the following:$],[$a$)$ Definitions of any key terms that specifically relate to the$],[$framework being discussed$],[$b$)$ A concise explanation of how the framework was developed$],[$c$)$ Definitions of any key terms that specifically relate to the$],[$framework being discussed$],[-$ Devise a comparison method or framework in order to compare$],[$TOGAF with other EA frameworks.$],[-$ Select a suitable framework for a particular situation based on a$],[$comparative analysis.$]]]]$