Assume that in a given class, Villain, the instance member xCoordinate and static member newOriginX, are both are declared public, allowing the client to use them directly (that's fine -- maybe there is no illegal value for either, so no need to provide mutators). Consider legal and correct the client code (where the two objects are members of the class in question): evilvillain1.xCoordinate 3; evilvillain1.neworiginx-2.2; evilvillain2.xCoordinate 5; evilvillain2.neworiginx-1.4; Immediately after this code, what are the values of the instance and static members? We will get warnings about accessing the static member through an object vs. the class name, but for this problem we ignore the warning- it's okay.) evilVillain1 has xCoordiante 5 evilVillain2 has xCoordiante 5 the class's static, if accessed through evilVillain1.newOrigin,2.2 the class's static, if accessed through evilVillain2.newOrigin,-2.2 evilVillain1 has xCoordiante 3 evilVillain2 has xCoordiante5 the class's static, if accessed through evilVillain1.newOrigin, - -1.4 the class's static, if accessed through evilVillain2.newOrigin,-2.2 O evilVillain1 has xCoordiante3 evilVillain2 has xCoordiante5 the class's static, if accessed through evilVillain1.newOrigin,- -1.4 the class's static, if accessed through evilVillain2.newOrigin,1.4 evilVillain1 has xCoordiante3 evilVillain2 has xCoordiante 5 the class's static, if accessed through evilVillain1.newOrigin,- -2.2 the class's static, if accessed through evilVillain2.newOrigin,-2.2 Consider the following 2-D array allocation: Dog[]l] lilikoi - new Dog[4][6]; Check the true statements O The original array declaration, with no additional instantiation, will create 24 Dog references. We can redefine the Dog object in the bottom row and right-most column of lilikoi] using the notation: lilikoi[4][6]new Dog); O lilikoiU0 is considered to have 4 rows and 6 columns O The original array declaration, with no additional instantiation, will create 24 doubles. for ( row = 0; row