Assume that you have been asked to write an analysis of whether a client is guilty of murder. The case occurred and will be tried in California. List the following in order from most to least authoritative and explain why you chose that answer a. A 1995 Illinois Supreme Court decision, with facts similar to your client's facts, in which the defendant was found not guilty of murder. b. A 1989 law review article that surveys all of the murder statutes in the 50 states. c. A 1980 California Supreme Court decision, with facts similar to your client's facts, in which the defendant was found guilty of murder. d. A 1990 California intermediate court decision, with facts similar to your client's facts, in which the defendant was found guilty of manslaughter. e. A California state statute defining murder and manslaughter. f. A section from Am. Jur. 2d explaining the differences between murder and manslaughter. g. A 1995 California Supreme Court decision on breach of warranty in automobile sales.