$.$ Assume the same facts as set forth in Question $1,$ plus these additional facts: The jury found Keith to be $10\%$ at fault $($because he was talking on his cell phone and ignoring his surroundings when he slipped and fell$)$ and Carol to be $90\%$ at fault $($because the banana peel was on the floor$).$ Which of the following statements is true? $[$Question $1$ facts: Keith slips on a banana peel in Carol$$s supermarket, is injured, sues Carol for negligence, and wins. Assume that Keith is awarded only compensatory $($and no punitive$)$ damages, and that Keith$$s medical bills are $$50,000,$ that his lost wages are $$40,000$ and that his pain and suffering $($as determined by the court$)$ is worth $$30,000.]$

Group of answer choices

Keith is likely to recover $10\%$ of his compensatory damages, provided that this accident took place in a contributory negligence state

Keith is likely to recover $10\%$ of his compensatory damages, provided that this accident took place in a comparative negligence state

Keith is likely to recover $90\%$ of his compensatory damages, provided that this accident took place in a contributory negligence state

Keith is likely to recover $0\%$ of his compensatory damages, provided that this accident took place in a contributory negligence state

Keith is likely to recover $100\%$ of his compensatory damages, provided that this accident took place in a comparative negligence state