Question: Assume we have the cumulative acknowledgment protocol with unbounded sequence numbers. Assume the channel can lose and reorder messages (but not duplicate). Furthermore, assume that
Assume we have the cumulative acknowledgment protocol with unbounded sequence numbers. Assume the channel can lose and reorder messages (but not duplicate). Furthermore, assume that the SWS = 1, and that the timeout of the sender is accurate,. i.e., the last action of the sender is replaced by when timeout frame#ch.sender.receiver = 0 and ack#ch.receiver.sender = 0 and LAR < LFS then send frame(LAR+1) to receiver. Under these conditions, is the sequence number in the acknowledgment really necessary? Briefly argue why yes or why no.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
