At age $17,$ in a state in which the age of majority is $18,$ Sally purchased a prom dress from Formal Stuff. She wore it to the prom and then attempted to return it to the store claiming that she was a minor and that she was entitled to a refund. The dress had clearly been worn and had a purple stain that Sally claimed was from grape juice. Additionally, a few days before she turned $18,$ Sally purchased a used car from Dings and Dents used cars. She had a deal whereby she paid $$100$ per month on the car. She drove the car and made payments for fourteen months after she turned $18.$ Then, she returned the car to Dings and Dents and told them that she wanted all her money back. Dings and Dents claimed the car was a necessity. Sally and her parents claimed that the parents were ready and willing to provide a car to Sally and that she only purchased the car from Dings and Dents because she liked that particular style and color. When purchases of the dress and car were made, the sellers knew that Sally was under the age of $18.$ In the dispute between Sally and the owner of Dings and Dents, which of the following is true regarding any claim that Sally affirmed the contract?