At the time when Czubinski engaged in his unauthorized browsing, the statute provided that his conduct would be a crime if the thereby obtained anything of value "unless the object of the fraud and the thing obtained consists only of the use of the computer." The statute has since been amended to read unless the object of the fraud and the thing obtained consists only of the use of the computer and the value of such use is not more than $5000 in any 1 year period How if at all, would the amendment affect the analysis in Czubinski and what is the amendment's apparent purpose? Explain.