Question: Baer v. Chase Briefcase With HOLDING:-Answer issue Yes or No. (Answer to both issues above is Yes.)-Indicate procedural result. Most often this will be: Affirmed;
Baer v. Chase Briefcase
With
HOLDING:-Answer issue Yes or No. (Answer to both issues above is "Yes.")-Indicate procedural result. Most often this will be: Affirmed; Reversed; Reversed and Remanded.
REASONS: Paragraph one:-Summarize the general legal basis for the courts decision without naming the parties. -Do not cite precedent (i.e., do not make reference to specific cases mentioned in the court's opinion).
Paragraph two:-Apply the legal reasoning to the specific facts of the case, naming the parties. -The only time the parties/litigants are named is in the Facts and in the second paragraph of the Reasons.-*Most significant parts of the analysis.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
