Banck costomer waiting time case

Using the IRAC format, analyze Boeken v$.$ Philip Morris, Inc. which is in your textbook.

Issue: Remember the bolded YBTJ statement is the "Issue"

Rule: Find the applicable, measurable rule of law in your textbook. You will have to identify the legal rule, and remember that no facts, opinions or conclusions should appear in the Rule section.

Analysis: without first determining the outcome, write a logical analysis applying the facts provided in the book to the legal rule you have identified in order to come to a logical and legally defensible conclusion. This section takes the most effort. Remember it is not a summary and it is not a choice between the two opposing sides presented in the book $-$ it is an analysis.

Conclusion: Please don't tell me what you hope will happen, or what you decided when you read the question what should happen, and please don't tell me what the court concluded. Instead, conclude as though you are the judge stating the outcome based on your analysis using the facts and applying the rule$-$ and remember to consider your own biases and any attribution $($errors$)$ you may have that might inappropriately sway a logical outcome.