Based on case Young v$.$ Weaver, $883$ So$\mathrm{.}2$d $234($Ala$.2003)$

Assuming that New Jersey Law is similar to the law of Alabama in the relevant particulars, explain whether Jones and Smith would likely be held liable to the Partnership for the outstanding rent requested on the basis that the townhouse rental was a necessary lodging expense that minors could not avoid by virtue of their status as minors.