Based on the information below, which system is better in terms of scheduling? Explain CPU scheduling in different operating systemsCPU scheduling in Windows:Windows uses a priority$-$based preemptive scheduling algorithm.The Windows scheduler assigns a priority level to each thread $($not a process$),$ and CPU is allocated based on these priority levels.The scheduler uses a quantum$-$based time$-$division mechanism to ensure that higher$-$priority threads get more CPU time.Windows scheduling policy can dynamically adjust thread priorities to improve responsiveness, especially in GUI$-$based applications. The kernel handles real$-$time and variable priority levels.CPU scheduling in macOS:Like Windows, macOS uses a priority$-$based scheduling mechanism, but it is heavily influenced by its Unix legacy.The operating system uses preemptive scheduling using both static and dynamic priorities.The scheduler ensures fairness and responsiveness using a multi$-$level feedback list, which allows the operating system to dynamically adjust the priority of tasks based on their behavior $($IO$-$bound or CPU$-$bound$).$The macOS scheduler is optimized for desktop workloads, with an emphasis on responsiveness and energy efficiency.CPU Scheduling in Linux:Linux uses the Completely Fair Scheduler $($CFS$)$ as the default scheduler.CFS aims to allocate CPU time proportionally to the weight or priority of processes, attempting to make it "completely fair".Linux also supports real$-$time scheduling policies such as FIFO $($First In First Out$)$ and RoundRobin for tasks that require strict scheduling guarantees.The scheduler is modular and can be configured or replaced based on specific kernel or system requirements.