Based on your Inconsistency and Conventionalization scale results, how do you think the rest of the data might be interpreted? Did they tend to be overly optimistic? Very critical? Were they consistent in their approach to answering questions or inconsistent? What does this suggest in terms of how you might interpret the rest of their test scores? How do you understand these scores given what you observed/learned during their clinical interviews? The interviews with Sandra and Tony show essential insights into their marriage, particularly within their scores on the Inconsistency (INC) and Conventionalization (CNV) scales. Both Tony and Sandra received a T-score of 56 on the INC scale, indicating a moderate level of inconsistency in their responses regarding their relationship. This average/moderate inconsistency suggests that both may experience internal conflicts or differing perceptions about their marriage, which could lead to conflicts and misunderstandings. Tony's score of 31 on the CNV scale indicates a low tendency to conform to social norms or expectations, suggesting he may approach their relationship with a more relaxed and authentic perspective. In contrast, Sandra's score of 42 on the CNV scale indicates a slightly higher tension, which may reflect her awareness of societal pressures and expectations in their marriage as a Middle Eastern woman living in the United States. This difference in their responses highlights a potential area of stress, as Sandra may feel the weight of external expectations more acutely than Tony, leading to her being more critical. 3