Behaviorists have pointed out that when subjects are given a choice between a sure$-$thing option of $$800$ and a gamble with an expected value of $$850,$ a substantial majority chose the sure$-$thing, which goes against the theory of rational choice. McKenzie and Lee in chapter $15$ argue that the choice is problematic because

Group of answer choices

the subjects were not given feedback on the allocation of choices of other subjects.

the subjects were not given time to carefully consider the expected value of both options.

the subjects were not given time to devise entrepreneurial means of $$picking up money being left on the table$$ by the distribution of the announced choices.

All of the above

None of the above