Bingham leased a small shop from Wright under a ten- ancy agreement that provided for a threeyear term at a monthly rental of $800 per month. The lease did not contain an option to renew, but following the expiry of the lease on October 31,2017, Bingham continued to pay the monthly rental of $800 to Wright. ' The term of the tenancy was never discussed between the parties, nor was the lease arrangement discussed until june 2018, when Wright gave Bingham a written notice that read: \"I have sold the property in which you presently occupy space, and the purchaser wilt require vacant possession on December 31, 2018. This letter gives you written notice to vacate in six months' time.\" In response, Bingham wrote Wright and advised her that he was in possession under a lease that did not expire until October 31, 2020, and that the notice given did not apply to his present tenancy. Wright gave Bingham a second written notice on October 25, 2018, now demanding vacant possession of the premises by November 30, 2018. When Bingharn refused to vacate the shop, Wright brought an action for a writ of possession. Outline the arguments that might be raised by the parties in this case. Render a decision