BNSF Railway Company v. U.S. Dept. of Transportation

566 F. 3d 200; 2009 U.S. App LEXIS 10288 (U.S. Court of Appeals DC Circuit)

The issue is whether requiring direct observation of urine testing of individuals who have previously failed a urine test is in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Questions:

1. Do you agree with the court's decision?

2. Is there another alternative to direct observation?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 Do you agree with the courts decision The courts decision in BNSF Railway Company v US Dept of Transportation is based on an interpretation of the F... View the full answer