Brian Griffin worked in data entry for several years. He typically worked 12-hour shifts, alternating nights and days. This is the basic shift patterns that his co-workers had as well. Due to physical conditions resulting from a stroke, he took some time off. When returning to work, he experienced vertigo and other neurological problems, reportedly linked to the stroke, when he worked beyond an 8-10 hours a day. Griffins doctor issued a work restriction to the employer, stating that he is restricted to 8-hour shifts at 40 hours per week, permanently. After good faith interactions between Griffin and the employer, the employer determined it could no longer employ Griffin under his 40-hour per week restrictions. Griffin believes this is a violation of the ADA. What would you argue if you were Griffins attorney? You must support your argument by applying the relevant law(s) to the facts of the case. Now, assume you are the employers attorney. You must support your argument by applying the relevant law(s) to the facts of the case.