Bright IT Consultants entered into a contract to provide computer consulting services to Turner Hardware Supply Co$.$ The contract provided that Bright would assist Turner in analyzing its computer needs. After that analysis was done, Bright would sell to Turner the selected computer system, including software. Bright would purchase the hardware and software and resell it to its client $($in this case Turner$).$ Typically, Bright would end up recommending to its client Dell hardware, although other Dell$-$equivalent equipment would obviously work. Upon completion of the evaluation of Turner$$s computer system needs, Bright recommended a particular Dell system. Turner refused to go along with the recommendation, terminated Bright and ended up buying an IBM system instead. Dell, which was aware of Bright$$s recommendation and Turner$$s refusal, has sued Turner claiming damages for the profit it would have made had Turner purchased a Dell system as recommended by Bright. Which of the following statements is correct?

Group of answer choices

A$.$ Dell will not be able to recover from Turner because it $($Dell$)$ was not a party to the contract between Bright and Turner.

B$.$ Dell will be able to recover from Turner because it $($Dell$)$ will suffer a loss as a result of Turner$$s refusal to follow the recommendations of Bright.

C$.$ Dell will be able to recover from Turner because Bright had routinely recommended Dell computer equipment to its clients in the past.

D$.$ Dell will not be able to recover from Turner because it was an incidental beneficiary of the contract between Bright and Turner.

E$.$ None of the alternative answers is correct.