Question: By identifying and rebutting these fallacies, I can avoid risks such as biased conclusions, a flawed investigation, or ethical and legal violations. It also reduces
By identifying and rebutting these fallacies, I can avoid risks such as biased conclusions, a flawed investigation, or ethical and legal violations. It also reduces the risk of creating a work environment where misconduct goes unchecked.
Respond to:
The fallacies of relevance most commonly encountered by criminal justice professionals are red herring, ad hominem, and appeal to pity. These are often used when individuals want to deflect attention, discredit the investigator, or gain sympathy. Recognizing these tactics helps professionals stay objective and focus on factual evidence, which leads to fair and ethical outcomes.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
