Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of 510,550,000 should be entered as 10,55 . Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places, NPV: $ million IRR: % b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated? 1. The environmental effects if not mitigated could result in additional loss of cash flows and/or fines and penalties due to ill will among customers, community, etc. Therefore, even though the mine is legal without mitigation, the company needs to make sure that they have anticipated all costs in the "no mitigation" analysis from not doing the environmental mitigation. II. The environmental effects should be ignored since the mine is legal without mitigation. III. The environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. IV. The environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. Therefore, since the mine is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis. V. The environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and shoufd only be considered at the time in which they actualify occur