Camrose.

$\backslash$table$[[$Factor$,$Weight,Red Deer,Camrose$],[$Incentive$,0\mathrm{.}40,80,55],[$Player satisfaction,$0\mathrm{.}30,15,55],[$Sports interest,$0\mathrm{.}20,45,85],[$Size of city,$0\mathrm{.}10,70,30]]$

a$)$ Based on the given information, the best location for the Warriors to relocate to is $,,$ with the weighted score of $.($Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.$)$

b$)$ Camrose just raised its incentive package, and the new score is $75.$ Why doesn't this impact your decision in part $($a$)?$

A$.$ Even if the score is $75,$ Camrose's total weighted score drops to $58,$ just ahead of Red Deer.

B$.$ Even if the score is $75,$ Camrose will stay as the second choice.

C$.$ Because Camrose is already the better site.