can someone help in finding out the solution for the below mentioned case study.

Module # and Module Name: _______________________________________

Case:The Windsor Spitfires Hockey Team's Journey to the Memorial Cup: A New Era of Leadership Prepared by:______________________________

1. CONTEXTUALIZE: Identify Learning outcomes in the module. Highlight the key ideas from the module. Identify the key idea(s) in the case. Connect the key module ideas to the case.	Learning outcomes (LO) are stated in the module introduction. These are the key ides that should be applied to analyzing the case. For example, in module 9: What is Authentic leadership? Practical/Theoretical The authentic leadership models. Add any additional relevant ideas from the resources you reviewed. Connect the LOs, key ideas, and case together to create the foundation for your analysis, alternatives, recommendations, and action plan. NO CASE DATA. Highlight key words to help guide you in the balance of your analysis. Use this section/information to inform what and/or how you choose to define and address the issue in the case.
2. SUMMARIZE: Identify the key information in the case as it relates to the current challenge and the key ideas in the module.	Summarize important case information. This is the only section that should introduce case data and information. Include all relevant information from the case details needed to support your analysis; be as specific. Use the context you outlined in the previous section to help edit out information not fundamental to your analysis. Be critical about what to include (or not) -edit carefully; be specific.
3. ANALYZE: A. Define the issue(s).	One or two statements that clarify and outline the issue(s); be specific. Each issue you identify in this section must be addressed in the following sections. If you identifiy numerous issues in the case that need to be addressed ask yourself if or how they are connected (i.e. do they stem from a single larger issue?). This will allow you narrow your analysis and discussion.
B. Analyze the case data.	Critically think about the context of the module (Section 1 - Contextualize) and the case data (Section 2 - Summary). How does the module context relate to case and to the issue at hand? Make the connections necessary to support possible conclusions regarding the pathways forward.
C. Generate alternatives.	Describe the options and/or opportunities (i.e. pathways forward) that may Resolve the situation? Create a structural solution that will resolve the situation? Take advantage of opportunities that may be created for the organization. Position the organization for go forward success. BE SPECIFIC
D. Select decision criteria.	Using your work from Section 1 and Section 2: What are the criteria you will use to consider your alternatives? Be specific about why these are the most important criteria to evaluate potential alternatives you outlined in the previous section (C). Consider module resources; can they help develop and/or support your criteria?
E. Assess alternatives.	Using your analysis from section C & D to consider the implications of each alternatives you outlined. Consider/outline the pros and cons of each alternative; be specific Draw conclusions about what you think needs to happen now
F. Select preferred alternative.	Choose one of the alternatives you identified above and be specific about why you think it is the best possible way forward. How you might/will mitigate the challenges (if any) during the implementation of recommendation.
G. Develop an action/implementation plan.	How will you implement your recommended alternative? Be specific, consider: Actions required - be specific? Input from others, approvals, feedback, process monitoring, reporting? Resources required (i.e. human, financial, operational)? Timeline(s). Specific dates and/or details are not required but you should demonstrate that you have thought through the implementation of your alternative and what the implications might be to the organization and individuals within it.

A strong case analysis:

• Starts with broad thinking (how does the case relate to the module title/Learning Outcomes)?
• Summarizes the case information, using the context of the module.
• Uses the key words in the context section as a reference point for the balance of the analysis.
• Uses the information in the summary section to narrowly define the issue(s).
• Generates alternatives that focus on the module context.
• Analyzes alternatives against stated criteria and considers the potential implementation challenges.
• Identifies a specific and well laid out action plan.
• Is well edited-includes only relevant information, stays in the context of the module, circles back to all previous sections/information presented, and uses carefully chosen words.