| 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% | 2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% | 3 Satisfactory 79.00% | 4 Good 87.00% | 5 Excellent 100.00% |
100.0 %Module 8 Rubric: Database Design Proposal: Product | |
30.0 %Write-Up Analysis | Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. | Ignores or superficially evaluates the detail requirements. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. | Surface level evaluation of the detail requirements is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported. | Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria. | Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates the detail requirements. Draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate, appropriate. |
40.0 %Prototype | Does not meet the assignment criteria. | Demonstrates minimal knowledge of the subject. Develops most of the database prototype assignment components (one or two components may be missing or inadequate). Does not describe the limitations of the database. | Demonstrates a moderate knowledge of the subject. Develops most of the database prototype assignment components (one component may be missing or inadequate). Does not fully describe the limitations of the database. | Demonstrates knowledge of the subject. Develops all of the database prototype assignment components. Describes the proposal plan. Justifies some of the limitations of the database. | Demonstrates a full and deep knowledge of the subject. Develops all of the database prototype assignment components. Accurately presents the impact of the database in practice. |
15.0 %Comprehension | Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. | Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. | Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or timeliness. | Content is comprehensive and accurate, and rationales are clearly stated. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. | Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; rationales are clearly stated. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
8.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) | Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of "primer prose" indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. | Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. |
7.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
100 %Total Weightage | |