can you do the same for this: In this situation, Titus agreed to buy Gram Parsons's turquoise 1960 Ford Galaxie from Elmer for $1 million, putting down a $50,000 deposit. Titus also spent $200,000 renovating his home to display the car as part of his extensive Parsons memorabilia collection. However, just days before delivery, Elmer breached the contract and sold the car to the Country Music Museum for $1,000,001 instead. Because the car is now in the museum's possession and cannot be recovered, Titus's only remedy is damages. There are three main types to consider: expectancy, restitution, and reliance. Expectancy damages are designed to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been fulfilled. In this case, Titus expected to receive the car, which had special personal and collector value to him. However, the court will look at the market value of the car, not Titus's emotional attachment. Since the museum only paid slightly more ($1,000,001) than what Titus had agreed to pay ($1,000,000), there's no real evidence that the car was worth significantly more than the contract price. This means Titus likely has no substantial expectancy damages, since he didn't lose any measurable profit. Restitution damages focus on preventing the breaching party from being unjustly enriched. Here, Titus gave Elmer a $50,000 deposit as part of the agreement. Because Elmer breached the contract, Titus is entitled to get that deposit back. This ensu