can you explaine $$administrative evil$.$ What has informed this perspective on this topic?

In chapter one, Balfour, Adams, and Nickels make the following statement:

$$Responsibility for the prevention of future acts of administrative evil rest in part with both theorists and practitioners who understand their role and identity in such a way that they can resist seductive and cunning temptations within moral inversions to apply expedient or ideological solutions to the many difficult issues that confront contemporary public life.$$ can you explain the authors' assertion? Could you provide $2$ citations to back up the explanation?